Make Your Words Shine
Articles and blog posts on elements of grammar that can be troublesome for writers.
Educated writers, aware of the difference between who and whom, will often generate sentences like the following:
| (1) | Whoever we elect as chair will do a good job. |
| (2) | He gives this document to whomever is in charge. |
But are these sentences correct? Many educated speakers and writers still have a hard time figuring this out.
Continue reading “When to Use Whomever and Whoever”
Decades ago, I studied abroad in Moscow, in the Soviet Union. One day, my Russian friends and I were walking along at VDNkh and came across a billboard that read ะัััะฐะฒะบะฐ ะัะพะณัะตััะฐ Vystavka Progressa. One friend decided to translate the billboard: “The exhibition of the progress.”
“Uh, no,” I responded. “Just ‘the exhibition of progress.'”
“Why?”
“I don’t know.”
Native speakers of English usually have no trouble with the use of the definite article the or the indefinite article a/an, but we can’t always explain the rule for their use. And non-native speakers, especially ones whose native languages are like Russian and lack both definite and indefinite articles, often have a really hard time figuring out when to use them.
So, for the benefit of learners of English and native speakers alike, let’s explore how definite and indefinite articles in English are used.
Continue reading “Definite and Indefinite Articles: How to Use โTheโ and โAโ”
To say that our cultural consciousness on matters of gender identity is rapidly evolving is an understatement. In a few short years, our awareness as a culture went from practically none to a kind of โhow could you not know that?โ state. Let me give you a quick illustration.
For many years, I had the privilege of working in a campus ministry context. The community I served was a community of students committed to sharing the radical, all-inclusive love of God with a broken world through acts of worship, devotion, service, hospitality, and especially social justice. Of the religious communities on campus, aside from the Unitarians, they were by far the most progressive.
Once, at a student leadership meeting in 2010, one of the students made an announcement about the menโs group breakfast the following weekend. โSo, if you like Canadian bacon and donโt have a uterus, youโre welcome to come.โ In three yearsโ time, in that same communityโa community that would invite โall female and female-identifying personsโ to attend women’s group meetingsโthis comment would have been viewed as terribly transphobic. But in 2010, no one even batted an eyeโin the most progressive and social justice-conscious religious community on a very liberal campus.
The speed of this change means that a lot of people are still catching up to the understandings of gender and how it differs from sex and biology. But it also means that even for well-meaning older folks, there are different obstacles that are hard to eradicate in quick order.
Continue reading “The Fault Is in Our Grammars: Language, Gender, and Pronouns”
In every language, there is a grammatical rule that is so embedded into the language that its native speakers are barely aware of it, even as non-native students of the language struggle to master it.
When I studied abroad in the Soviet Union,1Younger readers, ask your parents; it was a country more or less where Russia is now. I remember having a conversation with some Russian friends about the challenges of learning each other’s languages. “What’s the hardest thing about Russian grammar?” one of my friends asked me. “Oh, that’s easy,” I answered. “Verbs of motion.” (I even said this in Russian.)
“Verbs of what?” came my friend’s confused reply. He had never even heard of this category of verbโa category that bedevils students of Russian to this day. I explained what I was talking about, but it was clear that he was still mystified.
“Your turn,” I said. “What’s the hardest thing about English?”
“Sequence of tenses,” he said. In English.
“Sequence of what?” I replied.
Continue reading “The Sequence of Tenses in Reported Speech”
There’s an old joke that goes something like this:
Continue reading “Ending a Sentence with a Preposition”Some cowboys are mingling at the bar when an Oxford graduate walks in. “Howdy, stranger,” one cowboy says. “Where are you from?”
The Oxford graduate answers, “I come from a place where we do not end our sentences with a preposition.”
“Oh, I’m sorry,” replies the cowboy. “Where are you from, jackass?”
Space: the final frontier. These are the voyages of the starship Enterprise. Its five-year mission: to explore strange new worlds, to seek out new life and new civilizations, to boldly go where no man has gone before!
Star Trek, 1966โ1969
With these words a new era in science-fiction was launched, and the mission not only of the Enterprise but of an entire franchise was declared.
But these words also irritated an awful lot of grammar purists.
“To boldly go?” they objected. “That’s a split infinitive. That’s bad grammar!”
But why? What is so wrong with saying to boldly go? To understand that, you have to understand something about the history of English.
Continue reading “To Boldly Split Infinitives”
Unlike many of the so-called “grammar rules” that are really style rules, the rule against dangling participles is a good one.
A participle is a verbal adjective that comes in two main varieties: the present participle, usually formed with -ing, and the past participle, usually formed with -ed. These verbal adjectives generally function the way other adjectives do:
In addition, participles can head a phrase that modifies a noun in a sentence: